Skip to content

Conversation

@darrelmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Added ADR that captures decision to use ProtoJSON as the normative reference for JSON serialization

@darrelmiller darrelmiller requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2025 23:19
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @darrelmiller, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces an ADR template and a specific ADR (ADR-001) that documents the decision to use ProtoJSON for JSON serialization in the A2A specification. This aims to standardize JSON serialization and improve interoperability, but it also acknowledges potential breaking changes and migration efforts for existing implementations.

Highlights

  • ADR Template: Adds a template for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to standardize the decision-making process.
  • ProtoJSON ADR: Introduces ADR-001, which captures the decision to use ProtoJSON as the normative reference for JSON serialization within the A2A specification.
  • Breaking Changes: Highlights potential breaking changes due to the adoption of ProtoJSON, specifically regarding enum casing (SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE) and the loss of roundtrip capability for unknown values.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) for using ProtoJSON as the standard for JSON serialization, along with a template for future ADRs. The changes are well-structured and clearly articulate the decision-making process. My feedback includes a few minor corrections for typos and grammar in the ADR, and a suggestion to improve consistency between the new ADR and the template.

darrelmiller and others added 3 commits November 20, 2025 18:23
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
darrelmiller and others added 2 commits November 21, 2025 12:24
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@darrelmiller
Copy link
Contributor Author

/vote

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Vote created

@darrelmiller has called for a vote on Added adr template and protojson adr (#1214).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@a2aproject/a2a-tsc

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor Against Abstain
👍 👎 👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 7days. It will pass if at least 51% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

@amye amye added the TSC Review To be reviewed by the Technical Steering Committee label Nov 26, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in TSC Review Nov 26, 2025
@amye amye moved this from Backlog to In Voting in TSC Review Nov 26, 2025
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

3 similar comments
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

1 similar comment
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00
@lerhaupt Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Vote closed

The vote did not pass.

50.00% of the users with binding vote were in favor and 0.00% were against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
4 0 0 4

Binding votes (4)

User Vote Timestamp
@000-000-000-000-000 In favor 2025-12-02 0:36:28.0 +00:00:00
@ToddSegal In favor 2025-11-25 17:57:04.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller In favor 2025-11-26 12:27:04.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello In favor 2025-11-26 16:56:57.0 +00:00:00

@amye
Copy link
Contributor

amye commented Dec 2, 2025

This vote actually passed, editing labels to be clear.

@darrelmiller darrelmiller changed the title Added adr template and protojson adr docs: Added adr template and protojson adr Jan 12, 2026
@darrelmiller darrelmiller merged commit e6c5699 into main Jan 14, 2026
11 of 12 checks passed
@darrelmiller darrelmiller deleted the adr-protojson branch January 14, 2026 03:16
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Voting to Done in TSC Review Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

gitvote/closed gitvote/passed gitvote TSC Review To be reviewed by the Technical Steering Committee

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants